TOWARDS A NEW  WORLD VIEW .

.     

PRIVATE   PHYSICS  

            .

.  «  Εν οιδα, οτι ουδεν οιδανε .»  .

            The new theory of relativity         .         

The tombstone

in Einstein’s relativity

1.                              In God we trust one dollar.

      In the laws of God (my equations) we trust  trillions of dollars.

Private Physics is a book which costs many billions of euros. It is called private physics because the principles it introduces, the equations it presents, the new processes it brings in light, the new entities which materialize the processes and the laws which govern them, are discovered and accepted only by the author of the book, who is an ignorant carwasher, born with the disadvantage to intellect. No man other than this lay person ever managed to conceive and present thoughts so different from ours, so remote from the planetary logic, so closer to the truth, so contrary to the wisdom of 6,5 billions brains, which give the stuff to coat earth with cleverness. The unbelievable revelations and the inevitable revolutions it causes in our beliefs, make it a superior physics, strictly personal, rigidly private, utmost different, extremely remote and excessively contrary to what we have accepted. It says no where public physics says yes. And it says yes where current physics says no. It demolishes what we know, to establish what we don’t know. It is called private physics because it says the opposite of public physics. 

Public physics thinks of some physical processes that they don’t exist, that they are impossible. We people, need badly and wish ardently, these processes to exist, to be possible. The impossible, expresses the inadequacy of current physics, not the possibilities, which is giving to us mother physis. It is imperative for us to know, that, some utmost desirable and extremely beneficial processes, which we wrongly think that they are impossible, private physics shows that they are possible, they are feasible, they are exploitable, they are profitable. That is why the book private physics is the most expensive item money can buy on earth. It is also the reachest money and power producing source on earth.

Private physics saves us from ignorance, stupidity, debility. It enriches us with unimagined new knowledge. It elevates the cleverness of our brain, it empowers us with new abilities and possibilities. It changes the way we understand the world, it explains the world, it expands the world, it shows a new order of the world. It puts under our control unimagined forces, which govern the world. It creates a higher kind of inhabitants of the world.

We better not try to describe it and not try to advertize it. It does not fit in poor words, neither it needs empty words. It needs works. It needs actions, applications, practice, exploitation. Let mathematics talk persuasively about it and make believable what sounds unbelievable. In the following I present an abstract of the most insignificant part of private physics, for you to see by yourself its superiority and compare it with the errors, the lies and the inadequacy of public physics, which demands from you obedience and faith, to drive you far away from the truth and the practice. Private physics does not beg for faith, favor and devotion. It challenges and obliges you for peer review, critic, judgement, meditation, testing and decision. If you decide to accept it, it will cost you billions but it will give you knowledge, cleverness, power, freedom, independence, respect and trillions. You can not have these benefits from public physics.

2. The new theory of relativity        ( An Abstract )       

Relativity the diamond of physics, the strange theory which remained stable for one hundred years, which laureled with glory an insignificant patent office-clerk in Bern, and proclaimed Einstein the most famous herald of physics, now is going to step aside, within a few minutes taking to read some pages of this book. That which outshined for a century, we shall see it to be blown out within a moment. Suddenly, while all were celebrating the year of Einstein, a lay person appears to expose the errors of Einstein. But we must not put out the lights of celebration. Because, relativity is not blanked out in order to be extinguished completely. It is only pushed aside to give its position to its superior successor.

Τhis is the last from eight problems which, from 1997 I published in internet and I challenged the science of planet earth to solve them and take notice about my discoveries in theoretical physics. Up to this moment none of them is solved. Ηere I reveal the solution of problem 8, under the terms I set and I present a new relativity, which expands our knowledge in revolutionary conclusions, never imagined by the thought of men and never to go out of the thought of men. Soon I shall challenge the science of planet earth with new problems, the solution of which, causes much more dramatic subversions than the ones to see in this book.

3. Against stupidity even God attempts in vain.

Even a chicken, understands that when it opens its beak, the corn it had pecked, will fall immediately on the ground. This happens instantly and physically without any effort. Much sooner acts the stupid thought of the chicken to understand that the fall is going to follow, than gravity which causes the fall. In a similar way, physics says things, that the next act of the human brain should be to understand their logical consequence, much faster than we understand that a thunder is going to follow after the lightning. This has not happened. The meaningful data of physics give rise to sparks of logic but the «clever» brain of men never cought, neither the flash from the lightnings, nor the clash from the thunders. We have the arrogance to name ourselves logical, but we don’t have the ability to handle our inexisting logic with the clever way of a logical man. «It is in the fate of men to prove that we are subordinate to our ideals» says Voltaire. In arrogance we are unequalled, but from the aspect of logic we are just zero. I say this, not Voltaire and this is not a meaningless statement, it is a sad truth, the proof of which I am giving right away. There are many the findings of physics, that our undernourished thought did not catch their logical consequences and their physical entailments. One of them is the expression

Gm                                                                                          1

  r

This expression is a hundred years old intelligence test, for the genius, in which test they all triumphantly failed. The determinism which connects its entities did not act on the logic, which we suppose that has the human brain. No one so far was able to make the snowball of the thoughts deriving logically and easily from this unvalued expression, which was waiting for a century to be exploited by our inexisting cleverness, if this will be permitted by our inordinate stupidity. Lets we give our attention to it and it will give to us a very rich reward for our belated interest.

The above expression represents the gravitational potential, but irrespectively to this, it has dimensions of speed squared, and this is what we care about, because, specifically this speed squared, is going to be the star in this subversive novel of scientific rebellion we started to read. They say that men come from monkeys but even if my pedigree was from cabbage, I should not be so stupid to let this speed squared go unnoticed, not to make immediately the thoughts which derive instantly and automatically from this, which the pundits condemned, because, with their sharp cleverness they understood, that it has nothing important to say to them. The speed squared is the most basic parameter in relativistic equations, that is why me, with my immeasurable stupidity, I suspected immediately, that the above expression may have a connection with relativity, so close, so kind and so tender, as is the connection devil has with incense. But our brain too, has such a relation with logic, as had the head of Einstein with the barber-shop. So, like alchemists who tried to get something valuable from things which were cheap and scrubby, lets we see if this unminded relation can lead us to something serious in the issue of relativity, which the pundits have understood so good as good I have understood chinese.

4. I like those who try to achieve the impossible.     Goethe

Solution of problem No 8 to cause dissolution in current relativity.

In 1 which is  Gm/r  we put m = 9,1093897x10^-28 gr, which is the mass of electron, and where is r we put the what we call Compton wave length of the electron, which we can calculate by the equation  r = C/n  where the freequency  n  is deriving from the equation  n = mC^2/h, or n = (9,1093897x10^-28 x 8,98755x10^20) / 6,626075x10^-27 = 1,2355898x10^20.  So, we find that  r = C/n  = 2,4263104x10^-10 cm. Putting numerical values in 1 we take:

Gm  =  v^2                                                                                  2

  r                    

or  Gm =  6,6725x10^-8 x 9,1093897x10^-28  = 25,05137x10^-26 cm^2/sec^2        2a               

        r                    2,4263104x10^-10                                            

and   v  =  5,0051344x10^-13 cm/sec.                                    2b

If we repeat the same for neutron mn  = 1,6749286x10^-24 gr and its Compton wave length  rn  = 1,3195911x10^-13 cm  we take

Gmn = (vn)^2 or 6,6725x10^-8 x1,674928x10^-24 = 84,6926x10^-20 cm^2/sec^2 3   rn                                           1,3195911x10^-13                      

and    vn  =  9,2028585x10^-10 cm/sec                                    3a

The speed v and vn derived from equations 2b and 3a, I refer it to the particles m and mn respectively. I consider that this speed is interwoven with the particle. Although it looks as a theoretical entity, I don’t exclude the possibility to be a real entity and a physical process. In any case it is one of the quantum elements of the particle, an undetachable element of particle’s quantum idendity. Quantum elements of a particle, which constitute its quantum identity, I name its mass m, its energy E = mC^2, its freequency  n = mC^2/h,  its specific time  t = 1/n,  its Compton wave length r = C/n,  as well as other entities, which I shall mention when we come upon to them. A quantum element does not necessarily mean that has very small value and this can be seen in the frequency n,  which is a big number. The speed in question, I shall call it with the name gravitational speed, because its dimentional structure, besides mass and length, it also contains the gravitational constant G.

Einstein said: «If you want to become a great scientist, one hour a day you must think differently than the other» The gravitational speed, ignored by Einstein, will make us think differently than Einstein, not just an hour a day but for all the centuries.

Combining the mentioned particles with their gravitational speed deriving from the relations 2 and 3 we take:

mn   =   vn    or    1,6749286x10^-24   =  9,2028585x10^-10  = 1838, 68          4                                 

m           v              9,1093897x10^-28      5,0051344x10^-13

Based upon what is stated above, we can also accept that any speed can be considered as gravitational speed of a particle.

If we consider as such the given speed  V = 2,937354x10^10 cm/sec and if M is the particle which corresponds to it, then, applying equation 4 we take:

M  =  V                                                                                                                 5

m      v

Solving it for M we find that the mass which corresponds to the given speed V is

M  =  mV  =  9,1093897x10^-28 x2,937354x10^10  =   53,460106x10^-6 gr.             6

           v                     5,0051344x10^-13

Extending the same reasoning, we can say that light-speed C is the gravitational speed which corresponds to a particle. If in equation 4 we substitute vn for the speed of light C and call M the particle which corresponds to C, we take

M  =  C                                                                                         7

m       v

or   M  =  mC  =  9,1093897x10^-28x2,9979245x10^10                8     

                  v                      5,0051344x10^-13

and   M  =  54,562494x10^-6gr                                                      8a

This particle is already known to physics and I think that it has the name Plank’s mass, or unification’s mass, because in it, is unified the gravitational with the nuclear force. Now we find out that Plank’s mass obtains an extra feature of corresponding to the speed of light C, with the theoretical way we present in this essay. The equations 7 and 8 are prewarming our sleepy thought to accept the resounding entailing from the relation between C and M, which composes the most explosive mixture for the bomb I am going to put in relativity and in physics.

5.  A new relativity is arising in the horizon of intellect

From the above, we find out that to every particle corresponds a gravitational speed. We accept that there is a correspondence between particle and gravitational speed, which is going to lead us in conclusions never imagined. So, lets we follow a resital of logic, which, the more easy it is to be formulated by a carwasher, the most difficult it was to be discovered by the genius, and the simplest it looks, the more important the outcome is.

From 6 and 8 we take      V  =  M     or     V^2   =  M^2           9 C      M              C^2       M^2       They say that before a big earthquake small prodromal shocks occur.  The same happens with equation 9. Only an idiot can not see that since in my equations we can substitute fraction V^2/C^2  with  M^2/M^2 the ground on which  I have built my theory starts to shake. And as the earthquake creates new  water-springs and makes some of the other to dry, equation 9 creates a new relativity and makes my one to die.

A very bad day God is breaking in the paradise, where the soul of Einstein is resting. Cold sweat is bathing his photogenic face, which has become the symbol of cleverness. Ηis eyes, for which the books write that we see the Universe with, they get squinted at the sight of this damned equation 13. But even worse will be the day, devil brings in hell. Because, if Hitler sees this equation, he will make soap the german physicists, who were not able to discover it. Equation 13 is a new one, which does not exist in relativity of Einstein. But because of it, in a while, will not exist the relativity of Einstein.

From this nightmarish equation 13, since the entities of the second part are known, we can calculate the gravitational speed v which corresponds to the increased mass m, which electron has when is moving with the speed V.  So, by putting numerical values in the entities of the second part of equation 13 we find that

v  =                         5,0051344x10^-13                       .     =  2,50256x10^-12 cm/sec     14         

       {1– (2,937354x10^10)^2 / (2,9979245x10^10)^2 }                                       

The pilikon of the above gravitational speed as to the gravitational speed of the stationary electron is         

v   =   2,5025646x10^-12   =   5                                                           15                        

v         5,0051344x10^-13

The same relation has the increased mass m as to the initial rest mass m of electron, therefore we have the equation:

m    =   v                                                                                  16

m          v

From this we can find electron’s increased mass m which  is

m   =  mv  =  9,1093897x10^-28 x 2,5025646x10^-12   =  45,5469x10^-28 gr     17

             v                       5,0051344x10^-13                                          

In equation 12 we can do somesthing else too. We can substitute each speed of the fraction V^2/C^2, for the mass which corresponds to each one of them, as shown in equation 9. In this case we take:

m   =              m            .                                                              18

          (1 – M^2/M^2)

The above equation is unknown to relativity, but since the quandities of the second part of it are known, we can calculate the increased mass m even with this new equation and find that is

m  =                         9,1093897x10^-28                            =  45,5469x10^-28 gr     19

      {1– (53,460106x10^-6)^2 / (54,562494x10^-6)^2 }

Man is a logical and finite being. The logic, which nature granted to this two-feet crown of her creatures, preserved him from falling in the brutish level where I have fallen. That is why the previous thoughts, never passed through the wise brain of the logical men, proving that they are illogical. They match better to the brain of monkeys, which rather have discovered them since the time we had their shape, but we did not have their cleverness. I wonder, men are originated from monkeys, or monkeys are a superior kind of men, who were waiting for me to discover these easiest relations?

Did we solve the problem or not? Did we come to the same result given by the known relativity, or not? Did we solve it with new equations or not? Are equations 13 and 18 new or not? Do these equations exist in physics? In which book they are written? Who is the scientist who formulated them? Einstein did not know them, does this mean that we must not know them either? Do we need the wisdom of a professor to confirm the solution of the problem? The problem which for nine years remained unsolved by those who are authorities in relativity, found its solution by a lay person who is not authority even in washing cars. We see that physics is giving us the elements to solve the problem. What is not giving is the cleverness to combine them, to find their relation and build a new relativity much higher than the deficient relativity of Einstein. It is the first time within a century that we add something new to relativity and now that we see it, we are prepared to understand that which we can not see.

The solution of the problem ruins the myth, that discoveries are made in prestigious universities. It exposes the lies, that wisdom is monopolized by the famous professors. It vanishes the preconception, that excellence is represented by students with rich parents and poor intelligence. The dream to have a diploma from a prestigious university becomes a nightmare if you are obliged to stick the diploma in your ass, since you don’t have the cleverness to compete with a carwasher.  Any way, if you think that you don’t have benefit to read this book, don’t buy the book. But if you continue to read this abstract, the cleverness you will obtain, will compensate for the frustration you feel because it is not you, the writer of the book.  The expression 1 was known to every one. The cleverness to combine it  with relativity, was missing from every one.                  

6.  Washing cars does not give you titles.

     But it does not prevent you from obtaining titles

Except of the gravitational speed, one more element, which is refered to particle and is among the other which comprise its quantum identity, is the what I call specific time of the particle. This is equal to the period of the radiation of the photon deriving from the particle, when its mass is transformed to energy. Taking as example the electron, its specific time T can be calculated by the equation

mC^2 = hn   or 1   =  T =     h    . =                     6,626075x10^-27                  .        20 

                         n               mC^2      9,1093897x10^-28 x (2,9979245x10^10)^2

or     T  =   8,0933x10^-21 sec                                                                20a

Similarly the specific time T of the particle M  =  53,460106x10^-6 gr is

 T    =      h       =   1,3790663x10^-43 sec                                             21

            MC^2

The specific time  t  of  unification’s particle  M  =  54,562494x10^-6 gr. is

t    =       h      =   1,3512035x10^-43 sec                                              22                

           MC^2

Combining the above specific times deriving from 21, 22 with the mass of the corresponding particles, as well as with the gravitational speed of them, we take the equations

 V   =    M    =    t.                                                                                    23

 C         M          T      

But one more of the elements comprising the quantum idendity of the particles, is the Compton wave length. It is easy to find that the Compton wave length R of particle M is

R  =  C / N  =  4,134336x10^-33 cm                                                        24       

where N is the freequency  MC^2 / h   =  7,2512828x10^42 cgs            25 

The Compton wave length  R  of the unification particle M is

R  =   C /.N  =  4,050806x10^-33 cm                                                       26 

where N is the freequency MC^2 / h  =  7,400898x10^42  cgs                27 

It is self-evident that the gravitational speed which corresponds to a particle, it also corresponds to its specific time, as well as to the Compton wave length of the particle. Combining the lengths deriving from the equations 24, 26 with the equations 23 we take

V   =   M .  =   t .  =   R .         or        V^2   =    M^2   =    t^2 .  =    R^2         28                   

C        Μ         T        R                      C^2         M^2         T^2          R^2                 

From this we come to the conclusion that in the equations of Einstein, which give the change of the entities due to speed, we can substitute the fraction V^2/C^2 with any of the following three fractions   Μ^2/Μ^2,   t^2/T^2,   R^2/R^2.  Therefore, through this substitution, the known relativistic equations take new forms, as are the following:

m  =          m           .    =              m           .    =             m           .    =              m               29

        (1 –V^2/C^2)       (1– M^2/ Μ^2)            (1 – t^2/T^2)         (1 – R^2/R^2)

T  =              t           .    =                t             .   =              t           .    =              t           .    30      

        (1–V^2/C^2)            (1– M^2/ Μ^2)          (1– t^2/T^2)            (1– R^2/R^2)       

r   =  r(1–V^2/C^2)  =   r(1–M^2/ Μ^2)  =   r(1– t^2/T^2)  =   r(1– R^2/R^2)                31

                     a                                                                   b

where  m,  t,  r,  symbolize the corresponding entities when they are at rest,  m,  T,  r,  symbolize the same entities when they are in motion, (these entities do not necessarily belong to electron), V is the speed they are moving at, M, T, R are the entities which correspond to the speed V according to the equations 28 and M = 54,562494x10^-6 gr, R = 4,050806x10^-33 cm, t = 1,3512035x10^-43 sec are those which I call quantum elements of unification particle M to which corresponds the gravitational speed C.

«If they are rosebushes they will make roses» This is what a friend of mine said, when he read my equasions a. «They are bombs and  they are going to make a big explosion» This is what I say now that I see the disaster they cause to my theory the new equation b of that god-damned greek carwasher.

As the above photograph shows only black and white and hides the other colors of the coat of Einstein  the same way, his theory shows only the equations a and hides the equations b. The photograph hide colors of light, his theory hides colors of logic and processes of nature. The relativity of Einstein is so correct, as accurate are the black - white photographs to the reality. The equations of Einstein do not express the reality. They express only a black-white photograph of the multicolored reality. They reveal a deficient relativity and hide the most clever, the most revolutionary conclusions, the most unbelievable processes deriving from relativity. The relation my theory has with the theory of Einstein, is the same relation between color TV and black-white TV. And, as the color TV pushed aside the black-white TV, the same way my relativity pushes aside Einstein’s relativity.

7.        To kiss a leper I don’t mind.

      To shake hands with an idiot I don’t accept.    Pitigrilli

«After the stary sky that which causes the greatest wonder is the human stupidity» (Voltair)  After the publication of the private relativity, what will cause the greatest wonder, is the academic stupidity. I can not be boasting for my cleverness when I formulate such easy equations but we have no doubts about the stupidity of the illustrious idiots, who vomit arlubes about quarks and dark matter. Who prevented them to formulate these easiest equations?

The thoughts I developed to solve the problem and come to the new equations b do not express personal whims, or arbitrary acceptances of mine. They are a suggestion of mathematics and are in accordance with the rules of mathematics. All were done right. But what an irony. They were right, in order to bring us in a big mistake. A mistake of Einstein, which you suspect but you don’t see it yet because it is camuflaged with the veil of «correctness» The course we followed, for sure it was an ascend of logic, not to confirm the logic of Einstein, but to debunk the illogical logic of Einstein. The new solution we found, by no means is a second proof for the correctness of his theory. It is a proof about the mistakes of his theory. We kept pace with him, not because we agree with him but to show how vast is the distance which separates us from him, how superior is our logic, how big are his mistakes.

The new equations of group b, do not exist in relativity. The correctness of them every one can see it by himself and be convinced whether they represent new knowledge, without the need to have confirmation by celebrated idiots who blabber about big-bang. The big-bang of knowledge deriving from these equations can be seen even by those who are blind. We better leave the idiots to rot under their stupidities, because, we have to do something more clever, than hearing their stupidities. You have not realized yet how important is that, which we have achieved, with this seemingly insignificant problem, which is going to shock physics. Because, the issue was not just to solve the problem. We were asked to solve it with the terms I set. And the terms obligated us to find a solution which will not adulate relativity but it will push aside relativity. So, to go deeper I ask the question: Did we solve a problem of relativity, or we created problem to relativity? We found a solution unknown to Einstein, or we took the message that is wrong Einstein? We gave a solution in a relativistic problen, or a disssolution in relativity? Is it likely that we gave a spit in our stupidity?

Of course the result we find if we solve the problem with the equations of group b, is the same with the result given by the equations of Einstein. But are we sure that are correct the equations of Einstein? Is the result correct? He who will urge to give a positive answer in these questions will do a big mistake. The questions is a trap, because, you don’t know yet what are the consequencies of the new equations I presented to you.

He who did not have the logic to discover the above equations, had faith to  aspects which are subverted by the above equations.

If they alert you to see that relativity is wrong, wonder how many other theories are also wrong. Or, if you see that a carwasher can make discoveries, wonder how many are my secret discoveries. If you don’t do this, is small the benefit you have from reading this book.

8.  Experiments never proved that relativity is true. Only that is plausible

To formulate a correct theory you must take in consideration all the elements involved in the subject the theory deals with. This is a rule, which, obviously, has not been fulfilled by Einstein. The equation 13 puts a bomb in the theory of Einstein. We come in this, if in 12 we substitute particles m and m with the corresponding gravitational speeds v and v respectively. Each one of the equations 12 and 13 comprises a different form of the other. What equation 12 says about mass, is repeated by equation 13 about the speed. Einstein, though, says different things about mass and different about speed. According to his theory, mass can be increased due to its speed and reach up to infinity. That is exactly what equation 12 expresses. But for the speed, he postulates that it has a limit, which makes speed’s value not to exceed that of the light-speed C. This, though, is disputed by equation 13, in which, if we put V = C then v becomes infinite. This contradicts relativity, which postulates that light speed C is the maximum limit in speed. Therefore we have come to a terrible contradiction. We have a conflict with logic. A rebellion bursts against the hallowed aspects of Einstein. These contradictions undermine the fictitious correctness of his theory and make us to re-examine relativity, which has become a taboo. Taboos now are pushed away. They give their possition to critic, which opens the door of the prison into which our thought was captivated. Now our thought is free to show its power in the new relativity, which corrects, maximizes and dethrones the poor theory of Einstein.

But the dethroning does not come only from equation 13. It also comes from the equations of the group b. When we have the cleverness to find the equations of group b, we can not have the blindness, not to see that all of them, either in the group a, or in group b, they are all wrong. The equations a demarkate the cleverness of Einstein. The equations b demarkate the inexisting cleverness of mine. Equations b give the same result with the equations of Einstein. But they don’t give proof about the correctness of Einstein. They are a different form of his equations, but this different form leads to the subversion of the aspects of Einstein. It gives rise to thoughts which push aside the theory of the famous pundit. The assertions of Einstein about relativistic changes which reach up to infinity, or go down to zero and the above equations b do not go together. Equations b depict the mathematical form of a contradiction. They show a square circle. They give unlimited and infinite relativistic changes through physical entities which are finite. It is as if they say that a sphere with finite radius has infinite surface and zero volume. If someone thinks that equations b are the next step of relativity, is the step which leads it to the wreck. I reject my equations b even if its me he who discovered them. It is time for you to reject the equations of Einstein because, except of giving the relativistic changes, they also give rise to justified doubts and to destructive, may be construcrive, questions.

He who excels, quips   Einstein once showed his tongue to us. He did so to mock us for our stupidity, because of which we were not able to see the mistakes of his theory. Now, we show our tongue to him, because, he also was not  able to see the mistakes of his theory. «Eye for an eye» That is a jewish law. «Tongue for a tongue» That is my law.

9.  He who asks learns

We see that the equations b do not contain the speed of light C. Through them, the changes are given not in relation with the light-speed C but in relation with one of the quantum elements of the unification’s particle M. But in the equations of Einstein, the light-speed C, is considered as an absolute entity and a maximum limit. Since in the new equations of mine, the light-speed C has been substituted by the quantum elements  M, R, t, is it likely that we must accept that these elements are also «absolute» and final limits, which can not be surpassed? Is it likely that the relativistic changes stop in them? Since the speed becomes absolute and maximum limit when it reaches the value of the gravitational speed which corresponds to the entities M, R, t,  which is C, then, why the value of the other entities not to become «absolute» and final, when it coincides with the value of the corresponding quantum elements M, R, t? The presence of the quantum elements M, R, t,  in my equations, shows that they have something in common with C, which they substituted. By taking the role C had in the equations, means that they take also C’s immutability. The concept of absoluteness attached to C, and in general, the concept through which the change in the measure of the entities is governed by the immutability of C, now is transferred to the quantum elements M, R, t. Why then not to consider that these elements are also immutable final and extreme limits like C?  Is not logical such a concept? Or we must abandon logic in order to save a famous theory which gives evidences that it is wrong? 

Einstein accepted C as a maximum limit of speed, but he never justified why nature put this limitation only in speed. He never gave an explanation why nature let the other entities free to be able to increase up to infinity, or to decrease down to zero. This is a void in his theory, from which arise the question: Is it likely that the rest of the quantum elements of M are also final and unchangable entities? Is it likely that they are unsurpassable limits which put an end in the relativistic changes, which for Einstein are unlimited? If Einstein knew that light-speed C is the gravitational speed, which corresponds to the quantum elements of M, he should have given a positive answer to this question. From relativity we learned that, when force is applied on a stationary particle, the result is not only increase in its speed but there is also increase in its inertial mass, since it is set in motion. The question is, that, since the increase in speed has a maximum limit, why the mass-increase not to have also a maximum limit? Giving to this its logical extention, why the change of length and time not to have a limit too? Is it true that the inertial mass of a particle becomes infinite, when this is moving with the light-speed C? Is it true that the length of a ruler, the time of a clock and the force pushing a particle, all go down to zero when these entities travel at C? Why nature, from all quantum elements of M separated the gravitational speed, which for this particle is C, and gave it the privilege to be absolute and constant, while is not doing the same for the other quantum elements, but allows to them to be increased up to infinity, or decreased down to zero, when moving at C? Is nature which makes these discriminations, or is the incomplete thought of Einstein, which every one has adopted and only me is the one who abstains from it? And if the case is as I imply, is it likely that all quantum elements M, R, t,  must be considered as «absolute» «constant» and unsurpassable entities and as such to constitute the extra principles to base upon them an advanced relativity, than the one which is tottering in the two principles established by the respected architect of this limpy theory? 

These questions have such a corrosive power which makes us lose the confidence in current relativity. The persons who fought against it were not few but so far never have been formulated such dangerous hints for errors in the most rigorously tested theory of physics. The century of its dynasty transformed it in dogma. But the simple thoughts I presented give me the data to destroy the dogma.

After the formulation of the new equations b which give the relativistic changes through the quantum elements of particle M, I do not accept that Einstein’s relativity is correct. Einstein sees nothing special in unification’s particle M. He does the mistake to think of it as a usual particle, as Newton thought that light-speed C is a usual speed. He sets as a principle that light-speed is an absolute entity and a maximum limit but he does not understand that this limitness (oriakotita) of C, can not be separated from the limitness (oriakotita), which have the quantum elements M, R, t. All these are final and extreme limits which can not be surpassed. Since it is proved that C corresponds to the particle M, it is illogical not to accept that the limitness of C is transferred to the rest of the quantum elements of M.  Light-speed C, is the only visible mark nature lets us to see, in order to guide us to these limit having entities M, R, t, which only through the vision of thought we can discern. Beyond these limits, the change is a mistake of thought, not a physical procedure. Einstein, the more he approaches to C, the more goes away from what is entailed by C. Me, the more I approach to the entailments of C the more I stay away from Einstein. Einstein, the less he understands the limitness of the quantum elements of particle M, the more he clings in the limitness of C. And the limitness of C guides him in the relativistic change of the entities but it does not show to him neither that the change is scalable, nor that it has a finite limit. The limitness of C is a big stupidity when we see it as an exclusive property possessed only by the light-speed C.

The above conclusions come automatically in our thought as a logical consequence of the inconsequence of the equations of Einstein. They come as a logical entailment of the equations which I presented and of the connection C has with the other quantum elements of particle M. The limit that speed has at C induces to accept that the other entities have their limit in the corresponding quantum entities of particle M. The limit at the quantun entities of M, R, t,  we consider it as the most natural contingency which impulsively we tend to accept. Our sanction to it, is a simple applying of logic. The limitness of C finds its matching and predisposes us to see its reiteration in quantum elements of M. Thus, we accept that they too, are final limits and «constant» entities and as such they can constitute principles in physics and be the extra bases to support the limping relativity, for its correctnes to stop being like that of Piza tower. Τhrough the mathematical presentation of this aspect of mine, we come to conclusions for facts and processes which are unknown for the einsteinian relativity but when we see them through my equations we get surprised by the errors and  the ignorance, a verified theory can give to us.

«God does not play dices with the world»

Τhe atheist Einstein talks about God and God grants him glory because he did not understand that the divine dices are the quantum elements of unification’s particle M. Like the merchants who are selling the rope to hang them, the same way Einstein with the contradictions and exaggerations of his theory, he is giving us the rope of knowledge, to hang his half-correct relativity in the museum of science.

10.  Fight with correct equations and you shall win     Delphic oracle

By setting as principle, that the mass-increase occurring to a particle because of its speed has a maximum limit, which is the mass of unification’s particle M, I am obliged to find the equation which will express in the language of mathematics, what I express here with the language of impertinence. I must find the equation which connects the particle with the speed in such a way, which is in accordance with the principle I set and makes mathematics to be an advocate of my aspects. To do this, an eye-glance on the known relativistic equations will help us to formulate the thoughts which will lead us to the new equations we are looking for. Let’s we start from the known equation 12

m  =                 m                                                                         32

          (1– V^2 / C^2)

The above equation, in order to give limited mass-increase and such that the maximum limit of it to be the mass of the unification’s particle M, when particle’s speed is C, must be modified so that the denominator of this fraction will not be zero, but will have that smallest value, which, fulfilling the set principle, will give the desired result, that is, it will give final increased mass equal to the mass of unification’s particle M. This is accomplished if in the nominator of the fraction V^2/C^2 we add an extra parameter, so that the value of this fraction can come very close to one, but never be equal to one, even in the case where V = C. In addition to that, the extra parameter, must have variant value, related to the mass of the particle, so that for each one of them, when they reach the speed of light C, the equation will give increased mass equal to M. The parameter which satisfies these terms is the gravitational speed v, the value of which varies and is analogue to the mass of the particle and taking place in the equation 32 gives to it the form

m   =                     m                    .                                               33

      1– [ (V^2–v^2) / C^2]

In the above equation, if  m  is one of the usual particles and if we put V = C the square root which comprises the denominator of the fraction, does not become zero, but takes a very small value, so that particle’s increased mass, does not become infinite, when the particle moves with the light-speed C, but takes a finite value, which, according to the set principle, is equal to the mass of the unification’s particle M. Το this conclusion we can also arrive by the following reasoning. We write again equation 8 which is

M  =  mC     

           v

We repeat that v is the gravitational speed of particle m and C is the speed of light, which also is the gravitational speed of unification’s particle M. From relativity we have

M  =               m             .                                                           34

         (1 – V^2 / C^2)

Combining those two we take

C  =               v                                                                          35            

         (1– V^2 / C^2)

We see that the place which have the particles M and m in the equation 34, is taken by their gravitational speed C and v in equation 35. From this we can conclude that since C is considered maximun limit of speed, then mass M can be considered as maximum limit for the mass of a particle. This conclusion will take a mathematical expression by developing equation 35 through which we come to

C^2 – V^2   =  v^2                                                                     36                                              

and we end up to

V^2  =  C^2 – v^2                                                                      37                                       

Substituting this in  34 we take

M =                    m                   .                                                 38

    1– [ (C^2 – v^2) / C^2]

This is the equation we are looking for, which gives the mathematical expression in my aspect, that, when a particle is moving with the light-speed C, its increased mass does not become infinite but it takes the finite value of unification’s mass M. The corresponding equation of Einstein should give infinite mass. Since we have no proof about the correctness of the equation of Einstein, which give infinite mass-increase, it is possible that it gives us infinite stupidity too. That is why we are responsible to decide which theory we shall accept.

We observe that the parameter V^2 in equation 34 has been substituted by the equivalent expression (C^2 – v^2) in 38. That means that the equations 34 and 38 are equivalent from mathematical aspect. I do not accept that they are equivalent from the physical aspect, from the aspect of fact.  According to my understanding about relativity, the speed of light C, which is into the bracket of equation 38, represents the actual speed of the particle. The bracket (C^2 – v^2) does not express subtraction of speeds squared as a physical fact. Does not express the square of a resultant speed of the particle. In other words V^2, which corresponds to what is in the bracket, does not express the square of the particle’s speed. Expresses something which has theoretical meaning, not physical. The bracket (C^2 – v^2) by no means lessens the speed C, which has the particle, in the measure of V. The speed V of equation 34 is a theoretical entity, not a real entity. If Einstein thinks that speed V in equation 34 is the actual speed of the particle, for me he is wrong. The bracket expresses an abstract mathematical abstraction, which is consistent with the relativistic dialectic. This dialectic makes the changes to have dependence also on the gravitational speed v, which can not be missing from the relativistic equations. The bracket gives shape to the law according to which, the increased inertial mass of a particle moving with C reaches the value of unification’s particle M. The bracket does not show reduction of C. It reflects the deterministic relation of particle’s maximum speed which is C, with particle’s maximum inertial mass, which can not be increased up to infinity but only up to the mass of unification’s particle M. It shows that the speed of the particle is equal to the speed of light C, at the moment at which its inertial mass reaches the value of M. The gravitational speed v does not reduce the speed of the particle. It finds a deterministic relation with light-speed C and particle M, giving the equation which expresses the set principle, that the mass of the unification’s particle M is the maximum limit in the increase of a moving particle’s inertial mass and occurs in the maximum of its speed limit, which is not prohibited to be C but is necessary to be C. In Einstein’s relativity this deterministic harmony does not exist. What exist is a disharmony, according to which, when particle’s speed is approaching the finite value of light-speed C, its mass is approaching an infinite value, which even God is not able to give to it.

But the relativistic change of the other entities are also depended and affected by the gravitational speed. That means, that the gravitational speed v must enter in all the equations which give the relativistic change of the other entities, so, they will be corrected and reconciled to the concepts of this work. Starting from equation 30, which gives the change of time due to speed, by entering in it the gravitational speed v, it takes the form

T  =                       t                                                                     39

        1– [ (V^2 – v^2) / C^2 ]

In a similar way equation 31 which gives the change of length takes the form

r   =   r1 – [ (V^2 – v^2) / C^2 ]                                           40

In the above two equations the gravitational speed v corresponds to the time interval t or to the length  r.

Also, the gravitational speed of a particle which moves with the light-speed C does not become infinite, as shows the equation 13, but it takes the limited value of light-speed C. That is why, the gravitational speed must enter in the equation 13, to correct it and give it the form:

v   =                     v                                                                      41

        1– [ (V^2 – v^2) / C^2]       

It is self-understood that in the fractions V^2/C^2 and v^2/C^2 of the above equations, we can substitute each speed for the entity which corresponds to it according to the relations 28.  

Equations 41 give the concept of a speed v travelling with the speed V, hence affected by V. Einstein conceives v to be added to V. He talks about addition of speeds. I talk about a speed which is traveling with another speed. We have two different concepts, which are expressed with two different equations, and give two different results. Which is the correct result? Who proved that Einstein’s is the correct result? Equation 41 is contrary to Einstein’s equation, which gives the addition of speeds. We say more about it in the book.

Philosopher Emerson said: « The most scarce thing in the world is to find somebody who has his own private and personal aspect »

I disprove Emerson, because, I do have my own, my personal, my private, my heretic aspect, which is contrary to everbody’s aspect.

For me, the most scarce thing in the world is to find somebody to have a correct aspect. Who’s aspects are the correct ones, Einstein’s aspects, or my revolutionary aspects, which I don’t hesitate to express with the above equations? This is a question to puzzle every intellecting man after he has read this unexpected and subversive book. 

11.  To have the cleverness of Einstein in 1905 you should be genius. 

        To have his cleverness today you are vlakas.

Relativistic equations? Or a deterministic hammering against the most famous theory of physics? The simple thoughts of an ignorant carwasher, or an intellectual explosion to pulverize our beliefs and to vaporize our wisdom? No book contains the above equations. No university teaches these equations. No brain had ever the ability to discover them, neither has the ability to disprove them. These equations subvert physics and surprise the physicists. They challenge the pundits, they drive mad the authorities, who had never suspected their revolutioary messages. They put a bomb in the theory of a genius and raise the pedestal for the theory of a carwasher.

To create a universe is utmost difficult. Not to discover my equations is billion times more difficult. Humans, the miracles of cleverness, the dynamites of logic, the xurafia of intellect, who represent the cornice of nature’s creatures, by not been able to make my discoveries, give proof that they have surpassed even God in creative power. They say, «science rationalizes humans» Then why it did not rationalize them to find the above equations? Are not they more rational than the equations of Einstein? Or, it is likely, that, there not exist humans? May be, the opposite is happening: Humans rationalize the science. Except if you prove that my equations do not rationalize relativity.

«Time brings things in their completion says Maciaveli» «What a moment brings a whole year can not bring» says the proverb. What did not bring the one hundred years during of which we all adulated relativity, has been brought within a few minutes needed to read some pages of this book. The one hundred years which have been wasted to sublime relativity’s domination can not dispute the correctness of the above equations. The big words used to flatter the cleverness of Einstein, can not cover the mistakes of Einstein. And the more black is the cloud of the intentional silence, which collusively and insidiously is covering the new theory, the more heavy is the storm it causes to the intellect. Nothing remains intact and stable in front of the cyclone of the new concepts deriving from the new equations, which, the world cleverness, represented by the celebrated genius, was waiting for me an ignorant carwasher to discover. I am ignorant but I am not stupid, not to see the earthquake caused in physics by these equations. Neither remains stupid he who learns these equations.

Because the gravitational speed is different for one and the same entity, which has different measure, that is why the relativistic change of the one entity, is different from the change of the other, even if both of them move with the same speed. The relativistic changes which occur in the entities due to speed, are not uniform, they are scalable. The mass-increase of an electron is greater than the mass-increase of a proton, even if both of them move with the same speed. Besides, the changes are not unlimited, they are limited. They have a limit, in which changes stop. The mass-increase does not reach up to infinity, neither the length-contraction goes down to zero, as Einstein asserts. Nature does not need this wild, metaphysical dualism infinity – zero, to formulate her relativistic side. Einstein gives us the relativistic change, which is the general in relativity but he does not go further to the forms of the change, which is the particular. This is done by the new theory, which shows that the changes are scalable and limited, they don’t tend neither to impossible, nor to the inexistent. Relativity becomes more physical, more true, more logical when it is based on the principle that the change in the measure of an entity ends in the corresponding quantum entity of unification’s particle M, than to accept the unlimited relativistic changes, which no one ever proved that they can reach up to infinity or go down to zero. The mathematical superiority which the gravitational speed grants to the new relativistic equations is obvious in comparison with the deficient equations of Einstein and it dethrones the current half-correct relativity, which I admit that in spite its errors, it gave us a new world view, never imagined before.

To accept in 1905 that the relativistic changes are umiform and unlimited it was cleverness. To accept today that the changes are scalable and limited is an utmost higher cleverness.

Τhe next subversion caused by my theory, is in the principle set by Einstein, who postulates that mass is prohibited to move with the light-speed C. This principle is an error of logic. Einstein, by prohibiting mass to exceed C, he applies a clever thought. By prohibiting mass to move with C, he expresses a wrong thought. In my theory, a particle is not prohibited to move with the light-speed C. On the contrary, it is necessary to be allowed to move with C. In this case, its inertial mass also reaches the maximum of its increase, as well as all of its quantum elements reach to an unsurpassable value, which coincides with the value of the corresponding quantum elements of unification’s particle M. As nature permits energy to move with C, she also permits mass to move with C. Einstein is him who does not permit this to happen, but my equations reject his prohibition. He wants to convince us that, is feasible for nature to give an electron almost infinite inertial mass, but it is impossible to give it the finite speed of light. It is easier to accept that the roughness of the sea is caused by the trident of Posseidon, than to accept that the infinitesimal electron can not move with the light-speed C, or that its mass becomes infinite when moving with C. Infine is not the inertial mass of an electron when is moving with C. Infinite is our stupidity when we accept this wildness of current relativity, which does not take in consideration the gravitational speed.

The scalable changes of time subverts another wrong principle of Einstein, who says that two inertial systems are equivalent. In my theory, the scalable change of time, makes the system which is in motion, not to be equivalent with the stationary system. This eliminates another contradiction of relativity, which has been baptized the twins paradox. Nature does not have paradoxes. Our stupidity creates contradictions and to hide the contradictions of our stupidity we name them paradoxes.

But the most revolutionary conclusion deriving by the new relativity brings us in collision with the principle of physics, about the relativity of motion. We must not be sure that this principle is correct. Because, if really the relativistic changes are scalable and limited, as my theory predicts, then, in two clocks, of which the one works with different mode than the other, because to each mode corresponds different gravitational speed, (see equation 39) that is why the time dilation occurring due to speed, should be different from the one clock to the other, no matter if both of them move with the same speed. The scalable changes of time enable us to detect the motion of an object, without looking out of it, in a stationary system of reference.

With more complicate thoughts, which I describe in my book, the different time dilation between clocks working with different mode, enables us to detect the motion of earth, even if it is the only one object in universe. May be it is wrong to say that the motion of an object does not have meaning, if this object is the only one in universe. Motion causes DETECTABLE changes in the measure of the moving entities. So the meaning, which, motion does not have when we can not detect a change in position into the empty space, is obtained when we detect the change which occurs in the measure of time. The detection of motion is not monopolized by the detection of the change in position in space. Motion can be detected by the change in time. There are many paths to the forest. But there is no cleverness to discover the paths to the forest. In many cases our stupidity prevents us to discern meaning where there is meaning (dark forces) and in other cases the mules give meaning where there is no meaning (dark matter). In Einstein’s relativity the uniform change of the entities makes the motion which causes it, to be undetectable, invisible, mystic. It affects mystically the moving entities for the observer who moves with them. Einstein creates mysteries, I solve them. Worded otherwise, Einstein starts from mysteries in order to perpetuate them. I start from mysteries in order to solve them.

In some other times in the past, to say that the earth is moving, it was a crime which desecrated the Christian religion. Today, my assertion that we can detect motion, desecrates the relativistic religion, and the reverential herd ot its faithful sectary, can not stand it. But what can they do, to rebut it? In our intellectual conflict, there are no weapons against my theory. Weapons we shall get in the battlefield called experiment. There, is where we shall check whether the intellect coinsides with the truth, or identifies with the nonsense.

Einstein never proved that motion can not be detected. He proved that he was not able to detect it.  But as the theorem of Pythagoras does not hold for a spherical surface, the same way Einstein’s relativity does not hold when we have the cleverness to study nature spherically, not one-sidedly and purblindly, leaving the gravitational speed out of the relativistic equations. So, the relativity of motion will be re-examined.

A detectable motion and a variable light-speed, does not prevent us to build a higher relativity. Stupidity was preventing us and the stupidity is eliminated by the new relativity.

The sweeping change in our beliefs, caused by the private relativity, is so unfathomable and so incoceivable, as inconceivable is the distance between the finite mass of unification’s particle M and the infinite relativistic mass Einstein gives to a particle when moving with C. A new era is rising in science and intelligence. We have to do, not just with a new paradigm but with a unique paradigm in physics. If the experiments do not disprove the new relativity then physics will be written from scratch.

«Relativity has survived the most severe tests»

I don’t know how severe were the tests which did not test whether the relativistic changes are uniform or scalable.

12. If we call genius him who postulated that it is impossible to

      detect motion, what shall we call him, who makes possible

      to detect motion?

What a pity! Now I see clearly that I am wrong but is too late to correct. I didn’t discover the graal of Physics, as is the opinion of the crowd, which the year 2005 celebrated the century of relativity, without been  able to descern the mistakes of my relativity. Now  I discover the bitter glass of frustration, that I left out of my equations the gravitational speed and I did not understand that  the limitness of C can not be separated from the limitness of the other quantum elements of particle M. My glory which lasted for a century we see that it is falling within a few minutes needed to read this papers. My theory which was recognized as the superior feat of the human brain, proved to be the most inefficient work of the human brain. The pride of intellect, the miracle of cleverness, now we see it to be smashed by the simplest thoughts conceived by an ignorant carwasher. To be imposed my relativity needed years. To be pushed aside, a few minutes were enough. Its star was shining for a hundred years but it will be put out for the eternity. This is the fate of theories and I am not sure that Karamihas theory will avoid it. I am sure that it will last longer than mine. It will offer to us knowledge much more shocking, more unbelievable, more true, than the poor knowledge offered by my limpy theory, which now, with pride takes the road to the museum.

13.  Knowledge corrupts the idiots who are not able to discover it.

Is my theory correct? Ask the mafia of brothel-physics to give you the answer. There is no more hateful question than this. If they answer no, they must prove that my theory is wrong. If they answer yes, they prove that they were not clever to discover it. A correct theory is always a silent reproof against the cartel of idiots who failed to discover it.

Although I informed some civilized pundits about my equations, I never got an answer from them. On the contrary, I got answer from the hooligans in internet. «Fuck you plonk, get lost idiot, go away stupid» With these insults they attacked wildly against me, when I presented my theory in the news-groups of relativity. And the respectable professors, the civilized luminary of physics, brimful of culture and studiousness, dedicated to the truth and knowledge, with their silence in front of the insults, they showed their concent to the insulters and were giving their approval to the attacks of the hooligans.

I don’t blame them. If they showed interest for my theory, that should mean that they stop to obey to the mafia of brothel-physics, which orders denial to any new theory, which exposes the mafia’s stupidity. In that case the punishment against them should be disastrous. They are finished professionally if they don’t lick the ass of the godfathers of brothel-physics. They must adulate, not humiliate the extorters, to have their favor. They can not survive if they refuse to accept slavishly the quarks and dark matter, vomited by the mules who are stupid to discover the dark forces.

I know. The clowns, who have baptize themselves humans, have weaknesses, needs and problems. They must compromise to be helped to solve their problems. They must genuflect to fulfill their needs. They must lick asses to satisfy their weaknesses. Civilization is the derogatory subjugation to the asses, the civilized lick in order to survive. The civilized though, name themselves respectable, decent, dignified.

In this disgusting monstrosity of hypocresy, of falshood and cheat, which the cannibals call civilization, the concepts are distorted.

Those who lick asses to survive, are called respectable gentlemen. The idiots who can not discover the scalable relativity, are called authorities in relativity. The mules who can not discover the dark forces, are called experts in the dark matter. The schizophrenic whims of the godfathers of brothel-physics, are called theories of physics. The useless meats who live to fill up the cesspools with their thick shit, are appointed ministers of civilization. The zero qualifications of civilization-ministers shows the zero quality of the civilization.

You are not a respectable person just because you have baptized your nothingness respectable. Those who lick asses are asslickers, are not respectable. He who wants to be respected he must respect himself. And he who respects himself, does not respect mules. He who is a respectable and degnified person, does not allow to mules to transform physics in brothel-physics. Does not allow the crooks to challenge his intelligence with arlubes about quarks, big-bang and dark matter.

When the finger points to the moon, the godfathers of brothel-physics see the finger. When the «immutability» of light speed C pointed to the «immutability» of all the quantum elements of unification’s particle M, the celebrated idiots looked at big-bang. When the rotation of galaxies point to the dark forces, the stupid mules see the invisible dark matter. When the kindergarden physics points to the nuclear forces, the mules look at the colors of the inexistent quarks.

The little worms, if they discard quarks, they violate the oath to lick the brothel-physics godfathers ass. If they reject the dark matter, they will not be fed by the ass-matter. If they deny the big-bang, they will be deprived from the brothel-physics mafia’s ass-bang.

To lick asses or not to lick asses? That is the question.

Don’t stop to lick the brothel-physics godfathers fat asses. That is the answer.

«Into the dirt is the power, don’t listen to those who speak differently» Goethe.

The worms get power from the dirt, not the humans. If you are not a worm, if you are respectable, if you are human, then dare to ask the mules, who ever proved that Einstein’s equations are correct and who proved that my equations are wrong? If you want to have respect, ask the serpent-eggers of brothel-physics, why the relativistic changes are uniform and why they are not scalable? If you have dignity dare to ask why these equations have not been discovered in CERN?. In that case what is the benefit we take for our money they have wasted in CERN? Do the respectable, the dignified and prestigious dare to ask the godfathers why they did not discover my equations, or why they do not disprove my equations?

These are the questions to ask if you deserve to be called gentleman. Of course they offend some idiots. If you deny to ask these questions on fear that you offend some crooks and you will not have the favor of crooks, OK, don’t ask them. But don’t play to me that you are a respectable gentleman. If to survive you need to lick the asses of the crooks, you are an asslicker, not a gentleman.

So, don’t play to me that you are insulted when I call you asslicker. When I call you with the property to lick asses in order to survive, I am saying the truth, not insults. He who washes cars is carwasher and those who lick asses are asslickers. Carwashers can make discoveries. I wonder when the asslickers will make discoveries? This is the question they ask those who are respectable. If you are one of them demand to have the answer.

Scalable relativity is a spit against the cartel of idiots stupidity. How is possible for them to accept it. But the issue is, how is possible for them to disprove it.

When for a hundred years, one was considered a top authority in physics by accepting that the relativistic changes were uniform and unlimited, how is possible to accept now, that the changes are scalable and limited? When for centuries the prescient authorities of physics were pontificating that motion can not be detected, how is it possible for them to accept that motion can be detected? The vainglorious idiot, who has ridden on the big cane and phantasizes that he is the only monopolizer of wisdom, is adicted to a kind of arrogance, which makes unbearable the fact that he is obliged to gulp down the humiliation and accept a theory, which exposes his stupidity, when it proves that it was wrong, that which the arrogant thought that it was right. Now, the cane turns back and gets into the vainglorious idiot’s ass.  When a theory is formulated by a carwasher, it triggers us to compare it with the stupidity of the authorities, that is why the ctriteria they use to judge it, is jealousy, envy, hate. The hate and jealousy of the mules are not the weapons to disprove my equations.

Here comes another hateful question: Those dirty mounopana called scientific journlas, which you think that they are the gospels of science, since they are supposed that they have the cleverness to make peer review in the theories, why they did not see the mistakes in Einstein’s theory? Why for a whole century they could not see the connection gravitational speed has with relativity? Why they did not see the limitness of the relativistic changes in the quantum elements of unification’s particle M, as is shown by my equations? Can they disprove my equations and the predictions deriving from them? If not, what kind of peer review they are doing. How correct is physics, if nature is operating in accordance with my equations? Who is the mule who proved that my equations are wrong?

The more a pundit knows, the more stupid he is, when he can not exploit what he knows. How correct are all those which the insulters phantasize that they know, if the changes are scalable, not uniform? Can they imagine the snowball of subversions, the scalable changes cause in physics? In the civilization of the asslickers, these questions are prohibited. When you fray the parchments of those in the cartel of stupidity, they don’t feel shame, they feel hate. That is why they attacked wildly against my theory and by doing so, they confirmed my theory.

Hitler also had attacked against Einstein’s relativity. But he did so, not because he was stupid. He only wanted to bluff that he was not using it, in constructing the bomb. The idiots attacked against my relativity because they were stupid to formulate it by themselves. So, since the mafia of brothel-physics and the hooligans of the news-groups of relativity think that my theory is wrong, why not to devote it to Hitler? A wrong theory matches perfect with a wrong person. Hitler was killing people. My theory is killing the stupidity of the people. Is also killing the inexisting prestige of the mafia of brothel-physics. That is a crime thousand times worse than Hitler’s crime. To call someone thief, or cheater, or lier he does not care. To call him stupid, he never forgives you for saying this truth. My theory gives proof about the stupidity of those ostentatious, who play that they are the celebrated genius of earth. This, exceeds by far the crimes of Hitler. That is why a criminal theory must be devoted to a criminal person. So, we must devote my theory to Hitler and name it Hitler’s relativity. Since, my theory does not honor the inexisting intelligence of some idiots, why not to honor Hitler? Besides, they carry him into their dirty soul but here is a difference. Hitler killed himself when he found out his mistake. Those dirty cheaters, who vomit insults and torture our intelligence with disgusted piffles, when they will go to hang their dirty tomari, to save us from their stupidities?

Since the continent discovered by Colombus, the civilized named america, why the scalable relativity discovered by a carwasher not to be named Hitlerica?

Some civilized sensitive said:  No poetry after ausvitch. I say not another villainy after america.

We better not accuse nazis for their stupid attacks against relativity. The hypocritical and insidious burying of my theory by the crooks, and the insults fuck you, addressed to me by the hooligans of the news-groups of physics, is not less dirty and criminal than the attitude of nazis towards relativity. If Einstein lived today, he should admire my theory, which leads to the most clever conclusions ever conceived by the human brain. Why the insulters do not disprove these conclusions? Hitler for sure should write the book:

«The sonorous idiots of brothel-physics attack against the person who discovered the scalable relativity, because he exposes their immeasurable stupidity» And Ann Frank should write in her almanac. «The serpent-eggers of brothel-physics, who play that are genius, they promote stupidities about quarks and dark matter to send physics in the crematories, because they are stupid to send it in the height, in which is elevating by the scalable relativistic changes. They bury the theory which guides us to detect motion, and gives us the greatest emotion. They don’t want us to become clever by the new relativity which surpasses light-years Einstein’s relativity.

«Unfortunately the article you posted in sci.physics.research is inappropriate for the newsgroup because it is overly speculative»  Sincerily Igor Khavkine sci. physics.researchco-moderator.

This is the answer I got when I sent the abstract of my theory to be posted in the moderated newsgroups of physics-research. According to that Igor Khavkine, the equations I presented to you and the scalable relativistic changes are OVERLY SPECULATIVE. The uniform and unlimited changes predicted by Einstein, are not overly speculative. The assertion that the mass-increase can go up to infinity, is not overly speculative. The length-contraction down to zero, is not overly speculative. The principle that mass can not travel at C, is not overly speculative. The principle that the inertial motion can not be detected, is not overly speculative. «The experiments proved beyond any doubt that the inertial mass of an electron can exceed the mass of a trillion universes when it approaches the speed of light.» That is an indisputable fact, not an overly speculative wildness. Flat-landers are more logical than the «infinite-massers»

My theory is overly speculatine because is not formulated by those idiots who vomit quarks, dark matter and big-bang. These bullshit is not overly speculative. The scalable relativity is wrong, because is formulated by me, a carwasher. Should be correct if it was formulated by the four-wheel idiot of cambridge, who vomits dark matter because he is stupid to discover the dark forces. My aspect that we can detect motion, should be accepted if it was presented by the mules who masturbate in the super-strings. When I express this aspect, is wrong, is crazy, is discarded. For the cheat of LIGO they waste billions because it is suggested by the crooks of brothel-physics. The cheap experiment to test the scalable changes of time is denied because it is proposed by a carwasher. 

In some places, to dispute the crimes of Hitler is prohibited. To dispute Hitler’s relativity is allowed, is welcomed, is encouraged, is prompted. But to disprove it, is impossible.

My theory should be wrong, if the theory of Einstein was proved to be correct. Never an experiment proved that Einstein’s equations are correct. Never an experiment proved that the changes are uniform and unlimited. They never proved that particles can not move with the light speed C. Has ever a professor proved that we can not detect motion? Put it otherwise, has a professor the cleverness to detect motion? The inability of the professors to detect motion, does not prove that we can not detect motion. The experiments never proved that Einstein’s theory is correct. That means, they did not prove that my theory is wrong.

Hitler said: «Our objective is to win and when we shall be the winners who is going to ask us about the methods» The serpent-eggers of brothel-physics want to win and because they are stupid to win with discoveries, they win by blackmailing the asslickers to accept and disseminate stupidities. You don’t become a professor, if you don’t teach the garbage of brothel-physics. But you become an utmost respectable professor if you teach the unimagined discoveries of private physics. I am not blackmailing you to accept my equations. I am giving you the right to peer review, to criticize my equations. Do the serpent-eggers of brothel-physics give you the right to criticize their stupidities?

HITLER’s scalable relativity corrupts the idiots who were not clever to discover it. Corrupts them twice since, they are not able to disprove it. Corrupts them for third time since they are not able to develop it. That is why they try unsuccesfully to bury it, but instead, they are buried by it. Hitler’s relativity is not overly speculative. It is overly superlative. It is overly indicative of the stupidity of the crooks of brothel-physics.             HEIL HITLER.

14.  Laws change, that is a law.

But the revolutions and the subversions caused by my theory do not end to the ones I mentioned earlier. We saw that, according to my own private relativity, the relativistic change in the mass of the particles, (as well as in the measure of the other entities), is not depended solely on the speed, which is something external and irrelevant to the particle. It is also depended on the gravitational speed, which is inherent to the particle, it is a part of its quantum identification, which defines its individuality. From this we come to a first conclusion, that the laws governing the relativistic changes are not arbitrary, independent and unconnected with the changing entity. Are not something completely extraneous from it. The laws are not formulated in absentia from the entity, they govern. They are constructed with elements which belong to the entity, so that the laws are related to it, they have mutuality and interconnection with the entity. The law is governing the particle and is governed by the particle, because the latter is offering the elements, for the equation to be formulated, which expresses the law. This makes the law to be adapted and related with the changing entity, not to be imposed to it, in an arbitrary and absolute way.

This is an ascertainment of immesurable scientific value. We come to this for the first time through my heretic relativity, which shows that there is a mutual dependency between the law and the entity which is governed by the law. The scalable relativistic changes, show that particles are dynamic entities and demand from the laws to respect them and govern jointly with them. They have the cleverness to impose their will to the laws, and make them be formulated in accordance with particle’s individuality. They do not need to consist of quarks, as the mules vomit, but they do need to be elementary and individuated. Only this way they have the power to transfer their individuation to the laws, and obtain the jurisdiction to co-decide with them about the fate, which the laws reserve for them. Co-decision between the laws which govern, and the entities which are governed, is inconceivable by the public physics. Is an assertion of my private physics. It is contrary to the wisdom of the genius, but is in accordance with the ignorance of a carwasher. But the most important is, that co-decision happens not only in the relativistic processes. It happens also in other processes too. You will see in my book more about it.

From all these we come to a second conclusion. This is that, the laws are not the same for every different particle. Since the gravitational speed is different from one particle to the other and since it is a parameter in the relativistic equations, the result given by these equations for one particle at a specific speed, is different from the result given for another particle, moving with the same speed. Different result means different law causing the result. Hence before we assert that the laws do not change by the motion, we ought to have been sure that they are the same for every particle. From the new, the private relativity we see that is not so. Motion does not change the laws but it becomes the reason for us to see that the laws which govern every different particle, are different from the begining. So, instead of talking about the uniformity of the laws, may be is more logical to talk about the multiformity of the laws, which, motion makes it obvious and apparent. At the same time motion becomes obvious and apparent and probably absolute. It is a big mistake of Einstein to base his relativity on the prejudice that laws do not change by the speed. Of course they do not change by the speed. But this does not mean that they are the same for every particle. Since the laws are not independent from the particle (first conclusion), they are not the same for each particle (second conclusion). Laws do not change by the speed. They are changed from the begining. The laws do not need the speed to make them change and be different. They are different by themselves and need the speed to show that they are different.

The most important of this assertion is that the law-change does not happen only to the laws which govern the relativistic changes. It happens to the laws which govern other physical processes too. In these processes the laws which govern them are not the same for every similar process. That is why both, the reason and the outcome of the process is different than what even the serious and respectable scientists believe. Because the outcome is different, the conclusion on what really happens in these cases, is also different from what serious physicists believe. This is something you have never suspected. But it does happen in reality and physics must know the physical processes in which it happens, if physics wants to assert that it studies the reality and if it wants to have prestige and PROFIT by the knowledge it has on the reality.

The knowledge that the laws change, will demolish the wall which separates and deprives us from the ability to exploit the laws and make them work for us and give us higher control of nature. So when I say that you will pay me billions to get my discoveries I am not joking. Is not only the speed which causes changes to the entities. There are other reasons, or terms, or factors, internal and external, which affect the laws which govern the physical processes. Relations are not only between entities. Relations are also developed between entities and factors, or conditions, or terms, or influences under of which they exist. Exist does not mean I intellect, as Descart thinks. He who intellects does not need a carwasher to tell him that the laws change, does not lick the ass of the mules of brothelphysics, he does not gulp the cheat of ITER, does not accept stupidities about standard model, quarks, big-bang, dark matter, super-strings, LIGO, NESTOR and all these bullshit imposed by the mafia of modern brothelphysics. Exist means I exist under terms. It is blindness to say that universe consists only of mass, space and time. The forth substance of universe is the conditions, the factors, the terms and the influences under of which the other three exist. This is the most serious statement I can address to the clever and serious people who deserve my admiration and respect. Reality is independent from us but the physical processes are not independent from factors and conditions under of which they occur. Lenin said that speed is a condition in which matter can exist. But speed is not the only condition matter, or processes, exist and take place. There are many other conditions under of which matter can exist. These conditions affect matter, as is affected by the speed. Gravitational speed is not the only internal factor which affects a law and the outcome of a relativistic process. There are many other conditions, terms, parameters, factors, influencies which affect the laws and the physical processes which are governed by the laws. So, the laws change. The law in nature is the change, not the stability as believe even the serious physicists. They will become much more serious and respectable if they take in consideration that the laws change. Knowledge is not hindered by the change, is enriched by the change, provided that we know how the change occurs. When I reveal the laws which govern the change, a superior kind of humans will inhabit otiosely the earth. This assertion of mine does not only change the aspects we have about the world. Probably they will change the order which has been established in the world and the history of the world. Whether the history gets written with blue or red ink, depends on the morality which inspires us to use the power of knowledge. I don’t know if the knowledge on the law-change will be for the better or for the worse. I feel thrill at the thought that we shall make bad use of the change. If the knowledge on the change is not for the better, better not be knowledge on the law-change at all. We better have the mules of brothel-physics who are harmless with their immeeeeeeeeasurable stupidity, than carwashers who are dangerous with their ignoramce. Remember laws change, that is a law. I establish this law.

                                 Princeton 8 of August 2004

                              Pilgrimage in Einstein’s house

Father, without you I should be nothing. But without me, your theory should be nothing. I corrected it, I maximized it, I extended it, I glorified it. You gave me a piece of gold to discover a whole goldmine. All the other betrayed you. You showed them the limitness of C but they were stupid to proceed to the limitness of all the quantum elements of particle M. Sleep in peace and be proud of me. May be Saint Peter has informed you about my other secret discoveries. If you lived today the modern Hitlers should have killed you. You humiliated them in 1905 that they were stupid to formulate your theory, you humiliate them today that they are twice stupid to see and correct the mistakes of your theory. The mafia of brothel-physics does not forgive those who humiliate them and expose their stupidity. Only their garbage forgive, bless and disseminate. I did not take their disgusting garbage, I took from you the coal and I made the dianomd. They devoted it to Hitler. I devote it to you.

15.  Too late

Einstein became famous with relativity because the 100 physicists of Hitler could not disprove his theory. May be, I become famous, if the countless physicists on earth, can not disprove my scalable relativity. If I was living at the time of Hitler, he should make soap the German physicists, who could not push aside the theory of Einstein. But should be millions the Jews whom I should have saved from crematories. The dethroning I should cause to Einstein, should drive away the fear and the hate Hitler had against Jews, for their cleverness. His fury should die down when he should see that they were not so clever, since they can be surpassed, even from an ignorant car-washer. Since they formulate half-correc theories, they will never manage to «transform an aryan, in a white Jew» so they are not so dangerous to fear them and kill them, commiting the dirtiest and more unforgivable crime in human history.

Bad luck for Jews I was born too late in 1944. Born earlier, surpassing Einstein, I should have saved, not only our intellect from his unintentional lies but I should also have saved Jews from Hitler’s intentional crimes. Then, his fear and his hate should have different origin and different direction. And like angel Herod, who slaughtered the newborn nurslings, when he was told that one of them was Jesus Christ, who should take the throne from him, the same way Hitler should start the pogrom against carwashers, fearing that with their ability to discover knowledge, they also have the power to take him down from the nazistic throne.

Knowledge is power. The universe is not built upon the quarks and dark matter of the idiots. Is built upon and governed by the forces.  Force does not have the perfumes and the colors of quarks. It has the smell of gunpowder and the color of fire. That is why the system promotes that ridiculous clown of cambridge because he is harmless when he bears baby-universes from his ass. That famous idiot is shitting on the chair of Newton because he is stupid to extend the theory of Newton. He vomits arlubes about dark matter because he is mule to discover the dark forces. The system buries the researchers Pons and Fleishman, who probably they managed the cold fusion, and stupefies the herd with the olympic plague, big-bang, quarks, netrina, superstrings, dark matter, because all these disgusted garbage, take us away from discovering dark and terrible forces. If the proofs about cold fusion were inadequate, the proofs about the vomiting of the brothelphysics are inexistent.

Einstein, with his superb work, gave honor and glory to the Jewish race, which we must admit that has given many proofs about its superiority. He justified what I read once in an encyclopedia, that Jews are the most clever people on earth. Of course, the proof about cleverness is given by equations, not by encyclopedia, but we better leave it out, because it pains.

Irrespectively to that, Einstein, except of the glory he gave to his countrymen, he also gave them the obligation to surpass him, to develop relativity, to correct its errors, to eliminate its defects, its contradictions and its exaggerations. Jews proved to be small for this big legacy. Instead of developing relativity, they let it stagnant in its primitive form. The scalable changes, instead of been discovered by a Jewish professor in Jerusalem university, Jews let them be discovered by an ignorant carwasher in Athens.

Einstein showed to them the limitness of the light speed C, but they did not have the cleverness to make the small step towards the limitness of the other quantum elements of unification’s particle Μ and to the gravitational speed.

Without the gravitational speed into the equations, the relativity of Einstein has its position in talmud, not in physics. For Jews, trelativity was an inviolable religious dogma, for me a halfcorect theory of physics.This is what we call racistic dissension of aspects.

We are lucky that jews failed to discover the scalable relativity, because in that case the advertizing to it should have flumoxed us by the excessive incence to it. Thank God we are saved by the excessive incense. Now Jews will see the new relativity, as the devil sees the incense. That is why they remain silent. They pretend they don’t see the disaster. I don’t blame them. As nazis thought that it was not for their advantage to accept Einstein’s relativity, may be their victims today they don’t have advantage to accept my relativity. Then, nazis opposed for a star to shine. Their victims today may oppose for this star to faint. Einstein is not getting faint when with the limitness of C he shows us the way towards the limitness of the relativisric changes in the quantum elements of unification’s particle M. The idiots of quarks are getting faint, who were stupid to follow this way.

I don’t think Jews will fight against my theory. First they don’t have the weapons. Second, the scalable relativity is so tightly bound with Einstein’s relativity, as is the limitness of C with the limitness of the quantum elements of unification’s particle M. And by refusing the major, they refuse the minor too. While by accentuating the major they maximize the small. Coal takes value when been brother with the dimond. That is why we say «coal was the treasure». If Einstein did not give me the piece of coal, I should never made the diamond. The diamond of mine, gives glory to the coal of Einstein. That is why Jews will stop the hopeless war against me. Jews failed to discover the diamond but they must not let it unfinished. I advise them to stop the hypocrisy. They better take the diamond, enrich it with new facets and proceed to correcting the general relativity. And if they are clever enough, as the encyclopedia writes, I challeng them to proceed to my secret discoveries, which will cost billions if they want to buy them from me but they will gain trillions if they exploit them instead of me. Jews are wrong if they believe that they will take new discoveries from universities and the researching centers. To make discoveries we don’t need universities. We need to get rid of the stupidities they teach in universities. I am grateful to my fate which made me a carwasher and saved me from been an obedient, brainless student in a prestigious university.

16.  Einstein started cleverly but he run out of cleverness

Now lets we suppose that we have the particle m = 47,502235x10^-6 gr. Through equation 4 we find that the gravitational speed of this particle is 

V = 2,61x10^10 cm/sec. If this particle is moving with its gravitational speed, then its mass-change due to speed, is given by the equation

m   =                      m                                                                         42                                          

           1 – [(V^2 – V^2) /C^2 ]                                

From this we see with astonishment that, when a particle is moving with its gravitational speed, no change occurs in its inertial mass. If Einstein heard that, he should go nuts. When we hear it we become more clever. Our brain, molded into the cast of a deficient theory, feels happiness when it obtains the cleverness to see that there is no relativity for an entity, which is moving with its gravitational speed.

As wrong is an opponent of relativity who denies a particle’s mass-change due to speed, so wrong is a proponent of relativity who accepts it for an entity which is moving with its gravitational speed.

Because the gravitational speed of the unification’s particle M is C, that is why this particle, does not obtain infinite inertial mass, when moving with C but it remains stable and unchanged, disputing Einstein and obliterating his theory, as it concerns its validity about particles moving with their gravitational speed. The strange thing we had never imagined is that, in particular for particle M, relativity holds in a different way. As it is shown in my book, the critical mass of particle M, changes only when it is moving with speed less than C, which is this particle’s interwoven gravitational speed. In this case, its mass changes downwards and takes the value which corresponds to the speed it is moving with. Or, to say it with different words, the downwards changing mass of parti-cle M, has as gravitational speed, the speed which it is already moving with. One of the revolutionary conclusions about particle M is that, what ever its speed is, the mass of «M» varies according to its speed in such a way so that it always travels at its gravitational speed. With the new relativity, the unification’s mass «M» becomes the critical mass for the bomb I put in Einstein’s relativity and in whole physics.

I hope you understand that I put «M» into quotation marks, because moving with speed smaller than C, its mass becomes smaller than 54,5625x10^-6 gr. (For this reason in previous pages I put into quotation marks the words «absolute» and «constant») We shall see these thoughts and the corresponding equations with more details in my book’s chapter 21 which has the title: «Is it likely that the usual particles originate from retarded unification’s particles M?»

This sends to the hell the idiots who vomit about the bullshit called standard model.

Before a mule vomits that the above statements are overly speculative, he must prove that equation 42 is wrong.

The above conclusion is a glory of the mathematical logic, not because of the brilliance of the conquest but also because of the simplicity of the thoughts which lead to it. Who prevented you from discovering it a century ago? See, to make discoveries, we don’t need to be a dean of a university. We need logic, which is missing from the deans and the universities. How is it possible for them to accept the subversions caused by my theory? But the question is, how is it possible for them to prevent the subversions caused by my theory.

A scientific book which, to be written by a carwasher, was so unbelievable, it will say things which are also unbelievable.

We feel gratification together with encouragement and hope, when, with such an infinite ignorance of an uneducated carwasher, we manage to decode so deeply hidden, so inconceivable mysteries of physis. At the same time we feel infinite disgust caused by the idiots who blabber stupidities about big-bang, dark matter and quarks. Quark is a word taken from a book of James Joys, who expresses his «high respect» for the authorities, writing about them, that «they show their wisdom by teaching us how to wear the prophylactics» He was aware of the stupidities some idiots vomit. Unfortunately physis wanted us to co-exist with idiots.

You don’t insult someone when, saying the truth, you call him idiot. The idiot insults us when he thinks we are idiots to accept his idiocies about quarks and dark matter. Him who should admit that he does not know how much makes one plus one, I should respect him highly. To a big-bang blabber, who vomits that he knows the origin of universe, I should say to go fuck his ass. Instead of saying this, I better say to them to find my secret discoveries. There is no greater humiliation for the sonorous idiots to ignore secret discoveries made by an ignorant carwasher, who glorifies the human race with his findings. Only an idiot does not understand that I have discovered unknown and unbelievable physical changes, which are much more important than the scalable relativistic changes.

I reveal my relativity to give message about what I hide. «From the nail you can tell the lion»  From what I have revealed, even the most stupid can see two things. First, that I have made discoveries much more serious than the scalable relativity. Second, I don’t need the wisdom of professors, neither I need loads of knowledge to make discoveries. What I need is a little bit of brain, no more than a chicken’s brain.

So, with a chicken’s brain, which is missing from the celebrated genius, we shall study for a while the above particle m because, we have to refer something new, which is not predicted by Einstein, neither is discovered by the money-wasting hodjas of physics.

My first discovery, which confirmed my ignorance and gave me the courage to continue, was that a particle in motion corresponds to a wave. Combining the equations of Einstein and Plank,  mC^2 = hn,  or   mC^2 = hC / L, it was not difficult to find that, the wave which was inflating my phantasy had a length 

L  =   h C     =     h                                                                            43

       mC^2       mC

Based on this discovery, which De Broglie had done it since 1920, the Compton wave length Lc which corresponds to this particle m  is given by the equation:

Lc  =      h   .   =   4,652877x10^-33 cm                                            44

          mC

The length L of the wave, which is formed when the particle m is moving with its gravitational speed  V  is

L  =     h   .   =   5,344435x10^-33 cm                                            45

        mV

When the particle m is moving with the light-speed C, according to my relativity, its inertial mass will be increased to become equal to the mass of the unification’s particle M. In this case the moving with C particle m, is equivalent to a wave, the length  L of which, is                    

L  =     h  .   =  4,050806x10^-33 cm                                                     46

         MC

In other words  L  is the Compton wave length R of particle M.

Hence, these three lengths give the relation

 ( h )^2 .   =     h      x     h             or         (Lc)^2   =   L  x   L                 47

(mC)^2      mV       MC

or   (4,652877x10^-33)^2  =  5,344435x10^-33 x 4,050806x10^-33             47a

Swedish academy prized De Broglie for equation 43. I prize humanity’s intelligence with equations 42, 47. Humanity prized me back with fuck you idiot. We are even.

All the above entities are accepted by physics. Does the finding of their deterministic relation 47 enrich physics, or not? Which is correct, Einstein’s relativity which excludes the existence of eqation 47, or my theory which gives us knowledge about it? The fore mentioned mule, who said about my theory that it is «overly speculative» can he dispute this equation? Which theory is speculative, Einstein’s relativity which ignores this equation, or my relativity which reveals this equation? The hooligans of the news-groups vomited fuck you to me, not because my equations are wrong but because they expose the stupidity of the hooligans who were unable to discover them.

By the way, the famous professor Langevin discarded the equation 43, when De Broglie presented it to him. What professors can not discover, is overly speculative and they discard it. Their stupidity is not overly speculative that is why they never discard it. De Broglie got the nobel prize in physics because he started from an incomplete theory and ended up to the incomplete equation 43. Me, I got the prize «fuck you» because I did the crime to complete Einstein’s and De Broglie’s theories and rich to equation 47, which honors physics and our intelligence and deserves ten nobels. The mafia of brothel-physics is grateful to me. They prized me with «fuck you», I can not complain.

I am sure that it is known since centuries but I discovered it myself, that, if in a circle we inscribe an isoskeles triangle ABC, then the square of the side AB  (which is equal to the side AC) is equal to the product of the diameter of the circle, times the line AD. D is in the midpoint of triangle’s base BC.

We see with surprise that lengths which are defined by a geometrical figur, they have the same relation with lengths defined by a relativistic concept. Here physics is unified with geometry through common laws, which govern entities deriving from these two different areas of the reality. Weinberg got the nobel prize because with the bosons W, Z, he unified physics with syphilis. I got the prize «fuck you»  because with the equation 47, I unified physics with geometry. What a big Promitheic crime !

As the limitness of light-speed C is undetachable from the limitness of the quantum elements of unification’s particle M, the same way, geometry is undetachable from physics.

Einstein talks about the curvature of space. I talk about unknown relation between mass, motion and space. The aspects of Einstein prevent us from understanding relativity, which is completely different, is more complicated and mysterious, than what the famous pundit had imagined. Einstein says that, the inertial mass of a particle moving with C becomes infinite and its Compton wave length becomes zero. So the equation 47 is illogical for him. For sure his trelativity is illogical.

Swedish academy refused the nobel prize to Einstein because they thought he was wrong. But they did not know why he was wrong. The private relativity shows to them why Einstein was wrong. I should say half-wrong, or falf-correct, which-ever fits best.            

M =            m          .        (1–V^2 / C^2)		M =                m                .        1–[(C^2 – v^2) / C^2]
Einstein in Oxford becomes a honorary doctor of science for discovering the above equation of his uniform, unlimited and unproven relativity. The above equation no one ever proved that is correct. It honors Einstein but it does not honor our intelligence.		I  have been dishonored with «fuck you idiot» because I committed the crime to discover the above equation of my own private, scalable relativity, which demands experimental test. This equation no one ever proved that is not correct. It does not honor me but it honors our intelligence.

These two equations can not co-exist in physics. Since you don’t have proof about the equation of Einstein, you can not disprove the equation of mine. Don’t do the mistake to accept that the equation in the right is right. Don’t do the mistake to abandon Einstein. The mafia of brothel-physics will tear you apart. The Hitlers of today are million times worse than the original Hitler, who is an angel compared to modern Hitlers of the brothel-physics. Be afraid of dictators who are dominating without using tanks.

Here is something we must take seriously in consideration. Einstein excluded the existence of the equation 47. He also excluded the possibility to detect motion and prohibited the particles to move with C. Is it likely that he excludes laws and processes, which for him are inexistent and impossible but may be we can find out that they exist and they are possible? This is the question to puzzle those who want to have profit from my own private physics and from their own private intelligence. The answer to the above question will be given with my other books which cost billions. But ignoring their content, it will cost you trillion

17. I swear to say the truth,         only the truth, and         nothing but the truth

If Einstein sweared to say the truth, I swear to reveal his unintentional lies.

Does Einstein say the truth with his equation  M  =  m / (1–V^2/C^2)  or I say the truth with my equation  M  =  m / 1– [(C^2 – v^2) / C^2]

Which is true, the uniform, or the scalable relativistic changes? Is Einstein true, saying that we can not detect motion, or the truth is that we CAN detect the inertial motion?  Is Einstein true saying that mass can not travel at C? Einstein says that force creates motion from nothing. I say that, force increases a pre-existing motion. Who says the truth?  Is it true that the speed of cosmic-rays particles is caused by an external force? 

I say that it is inherent to the particles?  Is it true or not? Einstein says that the mass of the unification’s particle M can be increased upwards. I say exactly the opposite. I say that it can only be decreased downwards, who says the truth? I say that the usual particles originate from retarded unification’s particles M. Is it true, or not true? Einstein says that the laws which govern the physical processes are independent from the governed processes. He also says that the laws do not change. Is this true? I say that the laws are not independent from the entities which participate in forming a process. They depend on them, they are affected by them, hence they are not constant, stable and unchangable. Laws change. Is this a law? If this is true, then public physics becomes a museum exhibit, a collectors item to be sold in the antique shops.

The truths not found by Einstein, it is written to be revealed now that we celebrate the century of his unintentional lies.

Those who play that they are authorities in physics, are obliged to give an documentary answer, because, the respectable people who read this article, the clever people who judge before accepting the barufes vomited by the mafia of brothel-physics, demand to have a responsible answer. The more the mafiozi remain silent to this questions, the more they confirm my theory and the more they devote it to Hitler.

Einstein intentionally sweared to God to say the truth but unintentionally he said lies. God forgive him. To have good will, is not enough to be able to say the truth. He said only a small part of the truth, but IT IS NOT SMALL the significance of his tremendous half-truths. Small is the ability of the idiots to exploit and develop his valuable half-truths. That is why they sweared to vomit lies. They sweared to hide the truth because they are idiots, unable to discover the truth. For the cartel of idiots, since the antiproton is matter, why the antitruth not to be science? I mean brothel-science.

18.   As all women are beautiful when Venus is absent from next to

        them, the same way Einstein is clever, when my theories are

        absent from physics.

I can not present here all the revolutionary conclusions deriving from the new relativity. There are many other equations which I avoided to write because this is only an abstract and I do not want it to be very extensive. It is rather a summary, not an essay in full length. I shall mention only the following equations, which although they are the pride of logic, they are also the shame of physics, since it ignores these diamonds of intellect:

M  =                       μ                     49           1– [(C^2– v^2)/C^2]     C  =                       v                      50           1–[(M^2– μ^2)/M^2]        T  =                       t                    51           1–[(R^2– R^2)/R^2]           R  =  R1–[(T^2– t^2)/T^2]      52

 

Where  μ = hn/C^2  = 7,3725x10^-48 gr is the downwards limit, or quantum of mass,

v = R / T = 4,0508x10^-33 cm/sec is the minimum limit, or quantum of speed,

T = one second,  t  = 1,3512x10^-43 sec, is the minimum limit, or quantum of time, 

R  =  2,9979245x10^10 cm.  C  =  light-speed,  M  =  56,25x10^-6 gr.

Let the idiots of big-bang to disprove the above equations. Their correctness is so obvious, as obvious is the mistakes of Einstein. Is so unshakable as unshakable is the tombstone they put in relativity of Einstein. We don’t need an experiment to verify these equations. But never an experiment verified that the speed of a usual particle is less than C when its inertial mass reaches the value of unification’s mass M.

What is the incense for the devil, are the above equations for the theory of Einstein. They confirm triumphantly my theory and disprove dramatically his theory. Are they «overly speculative» as that mule vomited? The genius who bury these equations are called respectable professors. For them, they are overly speculative, not overly superlative. Einstein, not including them in his trelativity, prepares the fall of its validity. A correct theory must reveal relations between entities, not to hide them. All the above entities are accepted by physics. But the determinism which relates them, is unknown to physics. It is also against the beliefs of physics. It brings revolution in physics. Now we have the mean to compare the two theories. The theory of Einstein, which ignores these equations and the theory of mine which reveals them. So, we can make comparisons between the cleverness of Einstein and the stupidity of mine. The places in which the above equations are not known and are not taught, are called universities.

These enchanting equations give the most beautiful theoretical depiction of the aspect that the value of the entities fluctuates between a minimum and a maximum limit. For my theory, is not enough to set limits. It proceeds to formulate the equations which interrelate the limits. For the current unlimited trelativity, the above equations do not exist, because, light-speed C does not find its matching with other limited and final entities.

He who manages to match deterministic relations, which govern this infinitesimal quantum world, becomes much more a greater poet than those who are prized with nobel. The above equations are the confirmation of my ignorance. Our brain, which has the honor to make them its property, probably is derived as an evolution of these principial elements, which tended to create the mean through which they should take their self-awareness. May be they are what we were at the beginning of time, may be they are our deeper substance, the reason of our unreasonable existence. The above equations and infinity, or zero, are mutually excluded. If we accept the one, we exclude the other and here is where our intellect is called to solve a problem, so difficult, as difficult is to split a cock of hay to two donkeys. We must decide whether we shall accept these equations, or the current trelativity which has no idea about them, because, is lost in the indefinable infinity and is sunk into the absolute zero.

«The Frame Programm 7 of Europe aims to enhance dynamism, creativity and excellence in European research at the frontier of knowledge. To generate new knowledge and put European research in a leading position, opening the way to creating new scientific and technological results and probably unexpected results. To stimulate investigator-initiated frontier research across all scientific fields, on the basis of excellence»

This is how Europe advertises the Frame Programm 7.

I sent a copy of this abstract to Kafatos who is the president of Frame programm 7. He erixe ena boutso. I gave three copies to the what they call National Science Foundation of that dirty brothel here, which you call greece. They also erixan ena boutso. For these mules the scalable relativity does not enhance dynamism, creativity and excellence in the frontier of knowledge. Does not generate new knowledge with unexpected results. Does not stimulate frontier research in the base of excellence. It probably stimulates the slyness to plagiarize my theory and present it as the theory of somebody else, to be funded for the experiment to test the scalable relativistic change of time.

19.  Either Einstein or me. Both of us we can not co-exist in physics.       We can co-exist in the history of physics.
After the bombs in Japan Einstein said: « We should better have been shoemakers than physicists »	That is why I became a carwasher But after the bombs I put in physics I should better have been a harmless physicist, than a rebel carwasher.
«What is a mοnkey in comparison to a man is Karamihas in comparison to me»	What is a man in comparison to a monkey is my relativity in comparison to Einstein’s relativity.
«My theory is recognized as the highest achievement of the human brain»	Unfortunately that is true. It shows how infant is the human brain.
«The most inconceivable thing in the world is that the world is conceivable»	Ιf the world was conceivable the scalable relativity should have been discovered by the mules of brothelphysics, not by me, a carwasher.
«If you don’t have the correct theory  you don’t know what you observe»	If you have Einstein’s theory you don’t observe that the relativistic changes are scalable, hence, you don’t observe the motion.
100 physicists against Einstein. «If I was wrong, one to show me that   I am wrong, should be enough»	The mules of brothelphysics against Karamihas. If Einstein is not wrong, and if I am not right, one mule to show me this, should be enough.

M  =                      m                     

          1– [ (C^2 – v^2) / C^2]  

Each one of the above numbered sentences derives from the scalable relativity. Each one of them causes revolution in our thought, each one causes collapse in current physics. Never in physics history a new theory presented so many new aspects. Never caused so many subversions, never disputed so many convictions. Never appeared so many refutations to established admitions of physics. Never in the past occurred such a reformation in the way we understand nature. Such a gale of new ideas, such a storm of subversions never was born in the heretic thought of the one, to disprove the unshakable, sacred dogmas accepted by the wise thought of the other. It is not easy for the crowd to accept the private relativity but is not easy to reject the equations from which originates the private relativity. Prove that it is wrong. That is a challenge.

20.  Two heads in one cap don’t fit.

And two theories of relativity in one head, can not be squeezed either. Einstein’s relativity and mine is impossible to co-exist. The one excludes the other, and for the one to stand must disappear the other. The assertions of Einstein that the relativistic changes are uniform and they can reach up to infinity, or go down to zero, have never been proved experimentally. The assertions of mine that the changes are scalable and they stop at the quantum elements of particle M, never has been disproved. By ascertaining that a particle’s mass is getting increased by the speed, you don’t prove that it reaches up to infinity, neither you prove that the increase is uniform and the same for every particle. The change in the measure of an entity does not occur in an analogy to the speed of the entity. It also occurs in an inverse analogy to the approaching to the corresponding quantum entity of unification’s particle M. If you don’t debunk this assertion of mine, then accepting current trelativity shows stupidity, not that my assertion is wrong. If the quantum elements of particle M are unsurpassable and final limits, as I assert, then, the assertions of Einstein, that the relativistic changes can reach up to infinity, or go down to zero, are declarations of baron Mynhauzen. My equations create less doubt about them and more doubt about the equations of Einstein. If you don’t debunk my equations, then the predictions of Einstein are prophesies of Nostradamus. The term relativistic change means to change our aspects, not to exaggerate things with our aspects. We must understand Einstein, not incense him and what we understand when we study his theory, is the contradictions, the exaggerations and the voids of his half-correct and inaccurate relativity. We shall judge relativity not only by the inaccurate measurements in the experimental test. We shall judge it by the elements we take by the mental test. The inaccuracy and inefficiency of the experimental test, will be completed by the logical test. This holds for other theories too, to which I am going to attack, right after the capitulation Einstein will sign with me. What left unburnt the Inquisition, I shall burn it with logical examination. In relativity we must see what nature has in mind but so far we have not seen if is correct what Einstein had in mind, and of course we have not seen that it is not correct what I have in my mind. The experimental results do not contravene to my theory, but a more accurate measurement should give it the precedence. Accepting Einstein’s relativity after the objections opposed by my theory and the inaccurate measurements in the experiments, is like to accept that the earth is flat, after measurements made on the curvature which has the small square in my village Geraki. He who refuses my relativity is like to refuse his own theory which he should have formulated by himself, if he had the cleverness to start from the expression number one, from which starts all the revolution, the subversions, and the bahalo I cause in physics with this book.

Evangelos Karamihas

karamih@otenet.gr

www.karamihas.gr